The growth levers that actually move a New Zealand broking business, and where buying leads fits alongside referrals, repeat clients and content.
Figures in this article describe the wider market and are drawn from the third-party sources listed at the end. They are not Lead Foundry results, and nothing here is a projection of what any individual broker will achieve.
Growth advice for brokers usually assumes the constraint is demand. For most New Zealand firms it is not, and treating a capacity problem as a demand problem is how a good year turns into a burnt-out one.
The FMA reports just over 3,000 financial advice businesses: 1,807 Financial Advice Providers and 1,200 Authorised Bodies, engaging 10,743 financial advisers and 12,287 nominated representatives. 82% of financial advice providers are businesses with fewer than ten advisers.
A market of small firms means most growth questions are questions about one person's week.
| Lever | Conversion | Can you turn it up? | What it costs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat and existing clients | Highest | Only by having been in business longer | Almost nothing, if you keep in touch |
| Referrals from clients | Very high | Indirectly and slowly | Time and consistency |
| Referral partners | High | Somewhat, with effort | Relationship maintenance |
| Bought enquiries | Lower | Immediately | Money and calling hours |
| Owned content and search | Varies | Slowly, and it compounds | Time before it returns anything |
The two columns that matter together are conversion and controllability. The high-conversion levers cannot be turned up when you need them, which is exactly why paid supply exists.
The combination that works: Referrals and repeat business set the floor. Bought supply fills the gap between that floor and your capacity. Using paid supply to replace referral work is the expensive version; using it to smooth the gaps is the useful one.
At process, in most cases. The symptoms look like demand problems and are not.
Each of those is fixable without spending more on supply, and each will make supply spend work better afterwards.
Hours, not leads. Salesforce research puts the share of time sales professionals spend actively selling at around 40%, with the rest going to administration and internal work. For a broker, that non-selling majority is compliance files, applications and follow-up admin.
An administrator is usually the cheapest capacity available, because it does not require another licensed person and it returns the exact hours that lead handling needs.
The order matters. Adding supply to a broken process converts money into unworked records, and the resulting numbers make it look as though buying leads does not work.
Establish whether your constraint is demand or capacity before spending. Fix delivery and follow-up automation first, buy back administrative hours to create calling capacity, then add paid supply sized to that capacity. Referrals and repeat clients set the floor because they convert best, and bought enquiries fill the gap between that floor and what you can service.
Both, for different jobs. Referrals convert best and cannot be turned up when you need them. Paid supply converts worse and can be turned up immediately. Using paid supply to smooth the gaps between referral flow is the version that works; using it to replace referral effort is the expensive version.
Usually an administrator rather than a second adviser. Salesforce research puts active selling at around 40% of a sales professional's time, and for a broker the other 60% is compliance files, applications and admin. Buying that back returns calling hours without needing another licensed person or a long handover.
Check your median time from lead arrival to first attempt and your average attempts per lead. If the first is measured in hours or the second is near two, you have a process problem and more supply will make it worse. Both are calculable from your CRM in a few minutes.